Article

Treating calcaneal fractures nonoperatively versus operatively is controversial. The aim of open reduction is to reduce the articular surface and to restore the calcaneal bone anatomy to recover its function. The disadvantages of open reduction include wound complications, risk of screw penetration of the articular surface and peroneal tendons, and irritation by the fixation plate. We treated 12 patients with Sanders Type 3 calcaneal fractures with poor skin condition persisting for more than 3 weeks, making them unsuitable candidates for typical open reduction and internal fixation. The 12 patients had open reduction of the articular surface of the subtalar and calcaneocuboid joints, then a bone graft using a direct approach to the subtalar joint. The fracture reduction was completed by fixing the calcaneal tuberosity with an Ilizarov external fixation frame and distraction. These outcomes of these 12 patients were compared with outcomes of a control group having the same type of fracture but treated with open reduction and internal fixation. We used the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scoring system to assess the outcome. Both groups had similar functional and radiographic outcomes. The internal fixation group had a higher complication rate. The llizarov apparatus for reduction and fixation seems to be a safe and effective alternative to open reduction and internal fixation in patients with poor skin condition.

Langue : ANGLAIS