RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Critical appraisal of clinical prediction rules that aim to optimize treatment selection for musculoskeletal conditions

STANTON TR; HANCOCK MJ; MAHER CG; KOES BW
PHYS THER , 2010, vol. 90, n° 6, p. 843-854
Doc n°: 147270
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.2522/ptj.20090233
Descripteurs : DA5 - PATHOLOGIE OSTEOARTICULAIRE

Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for treatment selection in
musculoskeletal conditions have become increasingly popular. PURPOSE: The
purposes of this review are: (1) to critically appraise studies evaluating CPRs
and (2) to consider the clinical utility and stage of development of each CPR.
DATA SOURCES: Pertinent databases were searched up to April 2009. Studies aiming
to develop or evaluate a CPR for treatment response in musculoskeletal conditions
were included. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility and extracted
methodological data, stage of development, and effect size information.
Eighteen studies, evaluating 15 separate
CPRs, were included. Fourteen CPRs were at the derivation stage, and all CPRs had
been evaluated using a single-arm trial design, thus it is not possible to
determine whether the CPRs identify prognosis (regardless of treatment) or
specifically response to treatment. The CPR at the validation stage investigated
spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for low back pain and had been evaluated in 2
separate well-conducted randomized controlled trials. The first trial
demonstrated a clinically meaningful effect of the SMT CPR; the additional effect
from SMT in patients "positive-on-the-rule" was 15 Oswestry disability units at
week 1 and 9 units at week 4. The second trial showed that the CPR did not
generalize to a different clinical setting, including a modified treatment.
LIMITATIONS: Due to differences in methods of reporting and journal publication
restraints (eg, word count restrictions), some quality assessment items may have
been completed in the included studies, but not captured in this review.
CONCLUSIONS: There is, at present, little evidence that CPRs can be used to
predict effects of treatment for musculoskeletal conditions. The principal
problem is that most studies use designs that cannot differentiate between
predictors of response to treatment and general predictors of outcome. Only 1 CPR
has been evaluated within an RCT designed to predict response to treatment.
Validation of these rules is imperative to allow clinical application.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0