Article

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether neck manipulation is more effective for neck pain than mobilization. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial
with blind assessment of outcome. SETTING: Primary care physiotherapy,
chiropractic, and osteopathy clinics in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Patients
(N=182) with nonspecific neck pain less than 3 months in duration and deemed
suitable for treatment with manipulation by the treating practitioner.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive treatment with neck
manipulation (n=91) or mobilization (n=91). Patients in both groups received 4
treatments over 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of days taken to
recover from the episode of neck pain. RESULTS: The median number of days to
recovery of pain was 47 in the manipulation group and 43 in the mobilization
group. Participants treated with neck manipulation did not experience more rapid
recovery than those treated with neck mobilization (hazard ratio=.98; 95%
confidence interval, .66-1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Neck manipulation is not appreciably
more effective than mobilization. The use of neck manipulation therefore cannot
be justified on the basis of superior effectiveness.

Langue : ANGLAIS