Article

The evidence for the effectiveness of memory rehabilitation following
neurological conditions, mainly studied through quantitative methodologies, has
been equivocal. This study aimed to examine feedback from participants who had
been through a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing two types of memory
rehabilitation with a self-help control. It was envisaged that this information
would offer a detailed understanding of patient experience of going through a
trial and the perceived effects of having attended group sessions. Through 31
in-depth interviews, data collected were thematically analysed. The seven themes
identified highlighted improvements in insight and awareness of memory problems
and their neurological conditions, knowledge and skills about using memory aids;
and as a consequence, improvements in cognitive functions, mood, and confidence,
assertiveness and control over their condition. Participants also reported an
altered perspective of life that helped them deal with their problems, and the
therapeutic effects of attending group sessions. While these improvements were
mainly reported in the intervention groups, even those in the control group
reported some benefits. This study highlights that it is both feasible and
advantageous to embed qualitative research within the traditional RCT methodology
to arrive at a more nuanced understanding of patient experiences and intervention
outcomes.

Langue : ANGLAIS