Article

Physical therapy is commonly prescribed for patients with lumbar
spinal stenosis (LSS); however, little is known about its effectiveness.
The purpose of this study was to systematically review randomized controlled
trials (RCTs), controlled trials, and cohort studies evaluating the effectiveness
of physical therapy for LSS. DATA SOURCES: Studies were searched on electronic
databases to January 2012. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were: clinical
diagnosis of LSS with confirmatory imaging, evaluation of physical therapy
treatment, presence of a comparison group, and outcomes of pain, disability,
function, or quality of life. DATA EXTRACTION: Outcomes were extracted and, when
possible, pooled using RevMan 5, a freely available review program from the
Cochrane Library. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten studies were included: 5 RCTs, 2 controlled
trials, 2 mixed-design studies, and 1 longitudinal cohort study. Pooled effects
of 2 studies revealed that the addition of a physical therapy modality to
exercise had no statistically significant effect on outcome. Pooled effects
results of RCTs evaluating surgery versus physical therapy demonstrated that
surgery was better than physical therapy for pain and disability at long term (2
years) only. Other results suggested that exercise is significantly better than
no exercise, that cycling and body-weight-supported treadmill walking have
similar effects, and that corsets are better than no corsets. LIMITATIONS: The
limitations of this review include the low quality and small number of studies,
as well as the heterogeneity in outcomes and treatments. CONCLUSIONS: No
conclusions could be drawn from the review regarding which physical therapy
treatment is superior for LSS. There was low-quality evidence suggesting that
modalities have no additional effect to exercise and that surgery leads to better
long-term (2 years) outcomes for pain and disability, but not walking distance,
than physical therapy in patients with LSS.

Langue : ANGLAIS