RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphoedema (Lymph-ICF-LL) : Reliability and Validity

DEVOOGDT N; DE GROEF A; HENDRICKX A; DAMSTRA R; CHRISTIAANSEN A; GERAERTS I; VERVLOESEM N; VERGOTE I; VAN KAMPEN M
PHYS THER , 2014, vol. 94, n° 5, p. 705-721
Doc n°: 169943
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.2522/ptj.20130285
Descripteurs : FB4 - PATHOLOGIE LYMPHATIQUE, JQ - CIF

Patients may develop primary (congenital) or secondary (acquired)
lymphedema, causing significant physical and psychosocial problems. To plan
treatment for lymphedema and monitor a patient's progress, swelling, and problems
in functioning associated with lymphedema development should be assessed at
baseline and follow-up. The purpose of this study was to investigate
the reliability (test-retest, internal consistency, and measurement variability)
and validity (content and construct) of data obtained with the Lymphoedema
Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphoedema
(Lymph-ICF-LL). DESIGN: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. METHODS:
The Lymph-ICF-LL is a descriptive, evaluative tool containing 28 questions about
impairments in function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in
patients with lower limb lymphedema. The questionnaire has 5 domains: physical
function, mental function, general tasks/household activities, mobility
activities, and life domains/social life. The reliability and validity of the
Lymph-ICF-LL were examined in 30 participants with objective lower limb
lymphedema. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest
reliability ranged from .69 to .94, and Cronbach alpha coefficients for internal
consistency ranged from .82 to .97. Measurement variability was acceptable
(standard error of measurement=5.9-12.6). Content validity was good because all
questions were understandable for 93% of participants, the scoring system (visual
analog scale) was clear, and the questionnaire was comprehensive for 90% of
participants. Construct validity was good. All hypotheses for assessing
convergent validity and divergent validity were accepted. LIMITATIONS: The
known-groups validity and responsiveness of the Dutch Lymph-ICF-LL and the
cross-cultural validity of the English version of the Lymph-ICF-LL were not
investigated. CONCLUSIONS: The Lymph-ICF-LL is a Dutch questionnaire with
evidence of reliability and validity for assessing impairments in function,
activity limitations, and participation restrictions in people with primary or
secondary lower limb lymphedema.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0