RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Pragmatic Implementation of a Stratified Primary Care Model for Low Back Pain Management in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings

BENECIUK JM; GEORGE SZ
PHYS THER , 2015, vol. 95, n° 8, p. 1120-1134
Doc n°: 175330
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.2522/ptj.20140418
Descripteurs : CE51 - LOMBALGIE, CE62 - TRAITEMENT DE RÉÉDUCATION - RACHIS LOMBAIRE ET CHARNIERE LOMBOSACREE

The effectiveness of risk stratification for low back pain (LBP)
management has not been demonstrated in outpatient physical therapy settings.
The purposes of this study were: (1) to assess implementation of a
stratified care approach for LBP management by evaluating short-term treatment
effects and (2) to determine feasibility of conducting a larger-scale study.
DESIGN: This was a 2-phase, preliminary study. METHODS: In phase 1, clinicians
were randomly assigned to receive standard (n=6) or stratified care (n=6)
training. Stratified care training included 8 hours of content focusing on
psychologically informed practice. Changes in LBP attitudes and beliefs were
assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists
(PABS-PT) and the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale
(HC-PAIRS). In phase 2, clinicians receiving the stratified care training were
instructed to incorporate those strategies in their practice and 4-week patient
outcomes were collected using a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), and the
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Study feasibility was assessed to identify
potential barriers for completion of a larger-scale study. RESULTS: In phase 1,
minimal changes were observed for PABS-PT and HC-PAIRS scores for standard care
clinicians (Cohen d=0.00-0.28). Decreased biomedical (-4.5+/-2.5 points, d=1.08)
and increased biopsychosocial (+5.5+/-2.0 points, d=2.86) treatment orientations
were observed for stratified care clinicians, with these changes sustained 6
months later on the PABS-PT. In phase 2, patients receiving stratified care
(n=67) had greater between-group improvements in NPRS (0.8 points; 95% confidence
interval=0.1, 1.5; d=0.40) and ODI (8.9% points; 95% confidence interval=4.1,
13.6; d=0.76) scores compared with patients receiving standard physical therapy
care (n=33). LIMITATIONS: In phase 2, treatment was not randomly assigned, and
therapist adherence to treatment recommendations was not monitored. This study
was not adequately powered to conduct subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In physical
therapy settings, biomedical orientation can be modified, and risk-stratified
care for LBP can be effectively implemented. Findings from this study can be used
for planning of larger studies.
CI - (c) 2015 American Physical Therapy Association.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0