RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Machines that go "ping" may improve balance but may not improve mobility or reduce risk of falls

DENNETT AM; TAYLOR NF
J REHABIL MED , 2015, vol. 47, n° 1, p. 18-30
Doc n°: 172773
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.2340/16501977-1899
Descripteurs : DF11 - POSTURE. STATION DEBOUT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of computer-based electronic devices
that provide feedback in improving mobility and balance and reducing falls. DATA
SOURCES: Randomized controlled trials were searched from the earliest available
date to August 2013. DATA EXTRACTION: Standardized mean differences were used to
complete meta-analyses, with statistical heterogeneity being described with the
I-squared statistic. The GRADE approach was used to summarize the level of
evidence for each completed meta-analysis. Risk of bias for individual trials was
assessed with the (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) PEDro scale. DATA SYNTHESIS:
Thirty trials were included. There was high-quality evidence that computerized
devices can improve dynamic balance in people with a neurological condition
compared with no therapy. There was low-to-moderate-quality evidence that
computerized devices have no significant effect on mobility, falls efficacy and
falls risk in community-dwelling older adults, and people with a neurological
condition compared with physiotherapy. CONCLUSION: There is high-quality evidence
that computerized devices that provide feedback may be useful in improving
balance in people with neurological conditions compared with no therapy, but
there is a lack of evidence supporting more meaningful changes in mobility and
falls risk
- chute

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0