RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Linking of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons - Elbow questionnaire (pASES-e) to the International
Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) and Hand Core Sets

VINCENT JI; MACDERMID JC; KING GJ; GREWAL R
J HAND THER , 2015, vol. 28, n° 1, p. 61-67
Doc n°: 176639
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2014.10.002
Descripteurs : AD8 - DOULEUR, DD55 - PATHOLOGIE - COUDE, DD52 - EXPLORATION EXAMENS BILANS - COUDE

Content analysis-ICF linking.
The Patient Rated Elbow
Evaluation (PREE) and the self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow
Surgeons society - Elbow form (ASES-e) are the two commonly used elbow pain and
disability self-report measures (PROs). The content of these questions have never
been analyzed in light of the International Classification of Functioning
Disability and Health (ICF) which is the current standard to describe health and
health-related states. The purposes of this study were to analyze the
conceptual basis of the PREE and the ASES-e by linking the meaningful concepts in
these PROs to the ICF using standardized linking rules and to determine the
extent to which the ICF core set for hand conditions cover the content of elbow
questionnaires using summary ICF linkage indicators. METHODS: Two raters linked
the two PROs to the ICF using the linking rules proposed by Cieza and colleagues.
Percentage agreement was calculated between the raters. Summary linkage
indicators proposed by MacDermid were used to estimate the extent to which the
ICF core set for hand conditions cover the content of the elbow questionnaires.
RESULTS: All the items of the PREE (Measure to ICF linkage - 100%) and all but
one item of the pASES-e (Measure to ICF linkage - 95%) were linked to the ICF.
The satisfaction item on the ASES-e was not-covered by the ICF. Percentage
agreement on linking between the raters was 96% and 95% for the PREE and the
pASES-e respectively. The unique linkage of the PREE and the pASES-e to the
unique codes on the brief and comprehensive core set were lower than absolute
linkage to the core set for hand conditions. The PROs represented less than 20%
of the comprehensive core set and more than 70% of the brief core set. While for
the unique core set disability representation the 2 PROMs represented 100% brief
core set unique disability codes and less than 35% of the comprehensive core set
unique disability codes. CONCLUSION: The PREE and the ASES-e are aligned with the
ICF framework and the core sets for hand conditions.
The ICF Core Set devised for
hand conditions may also be useful for elbow conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.
CI - Copyright (c) 2015 Hanley & Belfus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0