RééDOC
75 Boulevard Lobau
54042 NANCY cedex

Christelle Grandidier Documentaliste
03 83 52 67 64


F Nous contacter

0

Article

--";3! O
     

-A +A

Home exercise programmes supported by video and automated reminders compared with standard paper-based home exercise programmes in patients with stroke

EMMERSON KB; HARDING KE; TAYLOR NF
CLIN REHABIL , 2017, vol. 31, n° 8, p. 1068-1077
Doc n°: 183748
Localisation : Documentation IRR

D.O.I. : http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1177/0269215516680856
Descripteurs : AF21 - ACCIDENTS VASCULAIRES CEREBRAUX

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with stroke receiving rehabilitation for
upper limb deficits using smart technology (video and reminder functions)
demonstrate greater adherence to prescribed home exercise programmes and better
functional outcomes when compared with traditional paper-based exercise
prescription. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial comparing upper limb home
exercise programmes supported by video and automated reminders on smart
technology, with standard paper-based home exercise programmes. SETTING: A
community rehabilitation programme within a large metropolitan health service.
SUBJECTS: Patients with stroke with upper limb deficits, referred for outpatient
rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to the control
(paper-based home exercise programme) or intervention group (home exercise
programme filmed on an electronic tablet, with an automated reminder). Both
groups completed their prescribed home exercise programme for four weeks.
MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was adherence using a self-reported log book.
Secondary outcomes were change in upper limb function and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: A total of 62 participants were allocated to the intervention ( n = 30)
and control groups ( n = 32). There were no differences between the groups for
measures of adherence (mean difference 2%, 95% CI -12 to 17) or change in the
Wolf Motor Function Test log transformed time (mean difference 0.02 seconds, 95%
CI -0.1 to 0.1). There were no between-group differences in how participants
found instructions ( p = 0.452), whether they remembered to do their exercises (
p = 0.485), or whether they enjoyed doing their exercises ( p = 0.864).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of smart technology was not superior to standard paper-based
home exercise programmes for patients recovering from stroke. This trial design
was registered prospectively with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials
Register, ID: ACTRN 12613000786796. http://www.anzctr.org.au/trialSearch.aspx.

Langue : ANGLAIS

Mes paniers

4

Gerer mes paniers

0